stone crusher supreme court judgement

  • Adherence to environmental and pollution norms cannot be

    It said that the tribunal should render its decision without being influenced by the observations made in the judgement. The top court noted that the appellant before it, along with his father, had initially moved the NGT for relocating the two stone crushers alleging unbearable sufferings due to noise and air pollution emanating from those units.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Supreme Court issues notice to KP secy mineral in stone

    ISLAMABAD (APP): The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday issued notice to the Secretary Mineral Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) in a case against crusher plants in Suraj Gali area of Haripur district of the province.A three-member SC bench comprising Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah heard the case regarding […]

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Adherence to environmental and pollution norms cannot be

    The appellant in the apex court had contended that as per an April 2014 report, the two stone crusher units were operating in violation of the statutory environmental norms, in close vicinity of

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • supreme court norms for stone crushing units

    Supreme Court Norms For Stone Crushing Units. 2020-5-9Supreme court norms for stone crushing units kleinoffemnl. Stone Crushers and Court Orders As Per the Supreme court order Dated 11 mar 2011 the KSPCB has allowed Stone Crushers in Karnataka to function till Sept 9 2011 Now Its a High Time that Stone Crusher Owners and workers associated in this

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Daily Court Digest: Major environment orders (August 17, 2020)

    The court was informed the UPPCB through an August 28, 2019 letter asked the project proponent to take remedial action. The violations, however, continued. Stone crushing. A complaint of illegal mining and stone crushing at Punjab’s SAS Nagar district prompted the NGT to direct the constitution of a joint committee to look into the matter.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Supreme Court Allows Texas Abortion Ban to Remain in Effect

    Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Abortion Law Opens Door to Copycat Schemes Everywhere By leaving the law in place and barring meaningful ways to challenge it, the court greenlighted state efforts to

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • crushers and high court of karnataka

    Supreme court judgement for stone crusher IN the high court OF karnataka AT bangalore dated in the high court of karnataka at bangalore dated this the th day of february 2014 present the honble mr.d.h.waghela, chief justice and the honble mrs.justice b.v.nagarathna writ petition no.14 between sri manjunath so late nanjemariyappa aged years

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • crushers and high court of karnataka

    Stone crushers and high court of karnataka in malaysia stone crusher safe zones in dharwad karnataka get court judgement on karnataka stone of karnataka as far as stone crusher units are concerned is pursuant to theby the hon39ble supreme court and thereafter to get the same certified by zone area for stone cstone crushers and high court of .

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION decided by a common Judgment. For the sake of brevity, the facts in Civil Appeal No. 5785 of 2019 are STONE/TILE FLOORING IN APARTMENT 50% OF BASIC+50% OF CLUB MEMBERSHIP 988925.80 11 ON OFFER OF POSSESSION

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

    the court of appeals, which affirmed a circuit court summary judgment in favor of plaintiff residents (plaintiffs) of the Town of Saukville (the Town). 1 Payne & Dolan challenges the court of appeals'' conclusion that the Town''s zoning ordinance does not authorize a conditional use permit for blasting and 1 See Weber v. Town of Saukville , 197

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Caldwell v. Petersburg Stone Co.

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT DOUGLAS S. CALDWELL, ET UX. ) CASE NO. 02 CA 8 ) PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS ) ) VS. ) OPINION ) PETERSBURG STONE COMPANY, ) ET AL. ) ) DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES ) CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County, Ohio Case No. 00-CV-117 JUDGMENT: Affirmed in part.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 218 OF 2021

    12. On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State Government to assess the functioning of the stone crushers and in the event, they are found violating any of the environmental norms, steps were to be taken for closure of the offending units.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • State Of Uttarakhand Vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher On 15

    State of Uttarakhand Vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher Judgment Dated 15-09-2017 of Supreme Court of India having citation 2017 (10) SCJ 39 , (2018) 14 SCC 537 , 2017 (11) SCALE 651 , LQ/SC/2017/1392 , include bench Judge HON''BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRIHON''BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN having Advocates For the Appellants M.R. Shamshad, Mishra Saurabh, Pankaj Bhatia, Kailash Chand, Syed Shahid Hussain

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Revenue Record Is Not A Document Of Title : Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court has observed in a judgment that revenue record is not a document of title. 1927 the bench while referring to judgement in State of Uttarakhand and Ors v Kumaon Stone Crusher

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Adherence to environmental and pollution norms cannot be

    The appellant in the apex court had contended that as per an April 2014 report, the two stone crusher units were operating in violation of the statutory environmental norms, in close vicinity of

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • crushers and high court of karnataka

    Supreme court judgement for stone crusher IN the high court OF karnataka AT bangalore dated in the high court of karnataka at bangalore dated this the th day of february 2014 present the honble mr.d.h.waghela, chief justice and the honble mrs.justice b.v.nagarathna writ petition no.14 between sri manjunath so late nanjemariyappa aged years

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Stone-crushing case: Supreme Court wants data on silicosis

    Stone-crushing case: Supreme Court wants data on silicosis patients. Takes up case of death of 18 labourers due to prolonged exposure to dust. ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court has asked all the provinces

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

    m/s shree ganesh stone crusher & ors. appellant(s) versus the state of haryana & ors. respondent(s) (with ia no.118337/2019-exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and ia no.118333/2019-ex-parte stay and ia no.118330/2019-permission to file appealmm and i.a.no. 155078 of 2019 application for vacating stay) with c.a. no. 7315/2019 (xvii)

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Stone-crushing units in K'taka be shifted in 6 months: SC

    Stone-crushing units in K’taka be shifted in 6 months: SC. The Supreme Court has pulled up the Karnataka govt for its failure to shift out stone-crushing units as ordered by it and directed the state to comply with the order within six months. A bench of justices G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly on Friday also imposed a cost of Rs one lakh each on

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Supreme Court issues notice to KP secy mineral in stone

    ISLAMABAD (APP): The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday issued notice to the Secretary Mineral Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) in a case against crusher plants in Suraj Gali area of Haripur district of the province.A three-member SC bench comprising Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah heard the case regarding […]

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Daily Court Digest: Major environment orders (August 17, 2020)

    The court was informed the UPPCB through an August 28, 2019 letter asked the project proponent to take remedial action. The violations, however, continued. Stone crushing. A complaint of illegal mining and stone crushing at Punjab’s SAS Nagar district prompted the NGT to direct the constitution of a joint committee to look into the matter.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • M/S Sarswati Stone Crushers vs Urja Vibhag on 14

    The order was set aside by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6725/2008 dated 19.11.2008), and confining the definition of "mine" as defined vide explanation (b) to Section 3 of 1949 Act, observed that, the stone crushing activities carried out by those other than mine owners and at a distinct place than the mine are not covered by the

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • M/S Jk Stone Crusher vs Ut Of J&K & Ors on 4 June, 2021

    12. Recently the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh, 2020 SCC Online SC 847 elaborately dealt with the scope and applicability of audi alteram partem rule. Hon''ble the Supreme Court after surveying the entire case law, in paragraph No.39 held thus:- "39. An analysis of the aforesaid judgments thus reveals:

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • REPORTABLE

    in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal nos. 4492-4493 of 2021 nv investment holdings llc … appellant versus future retail limited & ors. … respondents with civil appeal nos. 4494-4495 of 2021 civil appeal nos. 4496-4497 of 2021 judgment r.f. nariman, j. 1.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • crushers and high court of karnataka

    Supreme court judgement for stone crusher IN the high court OF karnataka AT bangalore dated in the high court of karnataka at bangalore dated this the th day of february 2014 present the honble mr.d.h.waghela, chief justice and the honble mrs.justice b.v.nagarathna writ petition no.14 between sri manjunath so late nanjemariyappa aged years

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 218 OF 2021

    12. On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State Government to assess the functioning of the stone crushers and in the event, they are found violating any of the environmental norms, steps were to be taken for closure of the offending units.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India & Ors | Judgments | Supreme

    Supreme Court Judgments. Subscribe. JAN TO JUNE; JULY TO DEC; Sub Menu contents. M.C. Mehta Vs. Writ Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed to pass into the air, and due to pollution, lives of the people living in some parts of

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

    m/s shree ganesh stone crusher & ors. appellant(s) versus the state of haryana & ors. respondent(s) (with ia no.118337/2019-exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and ia no.118333/2019-ex-parte stay and ia no.118330/2019-permission to file appealmm and i.a.no. 155078 of 2019 application for vacating stay) with c.a. no. 7315/2019 (xvii)

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • M/S GUNDOJI STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    He relies upon a decision of this Court dated 21st November 2019 in W.P.No.35133/2019. 3. We have heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. The application submitted by the petitioner will have to be decided in terms of the aforesaid judgment and order dated 21st November 2019.

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote
  • Silicosis Victims and the Importance of the Supreme Court

    Silicosis Victims and the Importance of the Supreme Court Judgment. The Supreme Court''s order on compensation to silicosis victims is a relief to workers and their families who have had a long

    WhatsAppWhatsAppGet PriceGet A Quote

© SME. All Rights Reserved. Designed by Sitemap